Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 22 > Issue 6 (1924)
Abstract
The problem indicated is one which has perplexed courts very frequently since the enactment of the Uniform Negotiable Instruments Law. Many of the cases dealing with the question are cited and reviewed in successive notes in 15 A. L. R. 437; 21 A. L. R. 1365; 26 A. L. R. 769. See also 59 PA. L. REV. 471 ; 64 Ibid. 318; 70 Ibid. 52; 10 CAL. L. REV. 413; 24 YALE. JOUR. 429; 28 Ibid. 197, 710; 30 HARV. L. REV. 515: 20 MICH. L. REV. 908; 21 MICH. L. REV. 591. Some recent cases may warrant a further discussion of the problem.
Recommended Citation
BILLS AND NOTES--PAYEE AS HOLDER IN DUE COURSE,
22
Mich. L. Rev.
581
(1924).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol22/iss6/7