Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 21 > Issue 7 (1923)
Abstract
One fertile source of friction growing out of the eternal struggle between capital and labor is the boycott. Standing out in definite relief for scarcely more than a generation, its effectiveness has led to interminable litigation. As might be expected, the boycott pronouncements of the courts in this formative period have had to undergo the most searching challenge and scrutiny. That this scrutiny will be focused upon the results of the recent first impression case before the Iowa supreme court cannot be doubted. See Ellis v. Journeyman Barbers I. U. of America (Iowa, 1922), 191. N. W. III.
Recommended Citation
BOYCOTT--CONCLUSIONS OR EMOTIONS,
21
Mich. L. Rev.
786
(1923).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol21/iss7/5
Included in
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, First Amendment Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons