THE SUPREME COURT'S ADJUDICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN 1921-1922, IV

Authors

Thomas Reed Powell, Harvard Law School

Abstract

That contracts between private parties cannot stand in the way of exercises of the police power for the promotion of health, morals and safety is firmly established. This principle was invoked against objection to rent regulation in decisions of the preceding term, and it is reiterated in Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. Siegel. In one of the cases involved in this decision a tenant was relieved of a contract made after the statute was enacted, and the landlord here encountered the further doctrine that "of course, a lease made subsequent to the enactment of a statute cannot be impaired by it."

Recommended Citation

Thomas R. Powell, THE SUPREME COURT'S ADJUDICATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES IN 1921-1922, IV, 21 Mich. L. Rev. 437 (1923).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol21/iss4/5