Note and Comment

Authors

Edgar N. Durfee, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
Harry J. Connine, University of Michigan Law School
Harry R. Hewitt, University of Michigan Law SchoolFollow
George C. Claassen, University of Michigan Law School

Abstract

The Mortgages in Possession in New York and in Michigan - It is interesting to observe how tenaciously the old common law of mortgages has persisted in the state of New York, the very cradle of the modem lien theory of the mortgage. As early as 18o2 Chancellor KENT began the importation into that state of Lord MANSFIELD'S Civil Law doctrines of mortgage. Johnson v. Hart, 3 Johns. Cas. 322. In 1814, in the case of Runyan v. Mersereau, ii Johns. 534, the lien theory definitely triumphed over the old law. In other cases, both before and since the statute of 1828 denying ejectment to the mortgagee, the details of mortgage law were worked over to harmonize with the central ,theory

Recommended Citation

Edgar N. Durfee, Harry J. Connine, Harry R. Hewitt & George C. Claassen, Note and Comment, 15 Mich. L. Rev. 58 (1916).
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol15/iss1/5