Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR > Volume 114 > Issue 6 (2016)
The petitioners in last year’s historic same-sex marriage case cited most of the Supreme Court’s canonical substantive due process precedents. They argued that the right of same-sex couples to marry, like the right to use birth control and the right to guide the upbringing of one’s children, was among the liberties protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. The Court in Obergefell v. Hodges agreed, citing many of the same cases. Not once, however, did the petitioners or the majority in Obergefell cite the Court’s most famous substantive due process decision. It was the dissenters in Obergefell who invoked Roe v. Wade.
Roe as We Know It,
Mich. L. Rev.
Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol114/iss6/3
Fourteenth Amendment Commons, Law and Politics Commons, State and Local Government Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons