This article was excerpted and abridged with permission from a chapter in Professor White's recent book Acts of Hope: Creating Authority in Literature, Law, and Politics. In the book, he explores the nature of authority in various cultural contexts. Here he examines the Joint Opinion in Planned Parenthood v. Casey, which has been attacked both from the right, on the grounds that it tried to keep Roe v. Wade alive, and from the left, on the grounds that it significantly weakens the force of that case. Professor White, by contrast, admires it greatly, and in this chapter explains why.
White, James Boyd. "Art of Judgment in Planned Parenthood v. Casey." Law Quad. Notes 38, no. 1 (1995): 52-60.
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons
Excerpted and abridged from a chapter in his book Acts of Hope: Creating Authority in Literature, Law, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.