It has long been fashionable to categorize antitrust by its "schools." From the Sherman Act's passage to World War II, there were (at least) neo-classical marginalism, populism, progressivism, associationalism, business commonwealthism, and Brandeisianism. From World War II to the present, we have seen (at least, and without counting the European Ordo-Liberals) PaleoHarvard structuralism, the Chicago School, Neo-Harvard institutionalism, and Post -Chicagoans. So why not Neo-Chicago? I am already on record as suggesting the possible emergence of such a school, so it is too late for me to dismiss the entire "schools" conversation as window-dressing. This Symposium is dedicated to defining and analyzing a "Neo-Chicago" School, so define and analyze we shall.
Crane, Daniel A. "A Neo-Chicago Perspective on Antitrust Institutions." Antitrust L. J. 78, no. 1 (2012): 43-65.
Antitrust and Trade Regulation Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Public Law and Legal Theory Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons
This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or downloaded or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association.