Michigan Law Review First Impressions | Vol 105 | Iss 1

Skip to main content

Home > Journals > Michigan Law Review > MLR FI > Vol. 105

Commentaries

Disparate Impact and the Use of Racial Proxies in Post-MCRI Admissions

Matthew S. Owen and Danielle S. Barbour

144

A Sheep in Wolf's Clothing: The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative as the Savior of Affirmative Action

Ryan C. Hess

139

What the MCRI Can Teach White Litigants about White Dominance

Adam Gitlin

134

"Framing Affirmative Action"

Kimberlé W. Crenshaw

123

The Michigan Civil Rights Initiative and the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Carl Cohen

117

The Dilution Solution: Populating the Trademark A-list

Scott C. Wilcox

113

The Trademark Dilution Revision Act of 2006: A Welcome—and Needed—Change

Dale M. Cendali and Bonnie L. Schriefer

108

What Is Dilution, Anyway?

Stacey L. Dogan

103

Dilution's (Still) Uncertain Future

Graeme B. Dinwoodie and Mark D. Janis

98

Stevens's Ratchet: When the Court Should Decide Not to Decide

Joel A. Flaxman

94

Putting the Guesswork Back Into Capital Sentencing

Sean D. O'Brien

90

The Revolution Enters the Court: The Constitutional Significance of Wrongful Convictions in Contemporary Constitutional Regulation of the Death Penalty

Jordan Steiker

85

The High Court Remains as Divided as Ever Over the Death Penalty

George H. Kendall

79

Legitimizing Error

Rebecca E. Woodman

73

Souter Passant, Scalia Rampant: Combat in the Marsh

Samuel R. Gross

67

This Way to the Egress and Other Reflections on Partisan Gerrymandering Claims in Light of Lulac v. Perry

Bernard Grofman

67

Anthony Kennedy's Blind Quest

Scot Powe and Steve Bickerstaff

63

Lulac on Partisan Gerrymandering: Some Clarity, More Uncertainty

Richard Briffault

58

Self-Defeating Minimalism

Adam B. Cox

53

Cultural Compactness

Daniel R. Oritz

48

Strict in Theory, Loopy in Fact

Nathaniel Persily

43

From Laredo to Fort Worth: Race, Politics and the Texas Redistricting Case

Ellen D. Katz

38

Still "Left in the Dark": The Confrontation Clause and Child Abuse Cases After Davis v. Washington

Anthony J. Franze and Jacob E. Smiles

33

Davis and Hammon: A Step Forward, or a Step Back?

Tom Lininger

28

Davis/Hammon, Domestic Violence, and the Supreme Court: The Case for Cautious Optimism

Joan S. Meier

22

Circling around the Confrontation Clause: Redefined Reach But Not a Robust Right

Lisa Kern Griffin

16

Refining Crawford: The Confrontation Claus After Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana

Andrew C. Fine

11

Davis v. Washington and Hammon v. Indiana: Beating Expectations

Robert P. Mosteller

6

We Really (for the most part) Mean It!

Richard D. Friedman

1