I recently reviewed God vs. the Gavel by Professor Marci Hamilton, and she published a brief response. My review briefly summarized the book and then made three principal points, addressing Hamilton's institutional competence thesis, her "no-harm" principle, and the remarkable number of legal and factual errors in the book. In this reply, I will review each of these points in turn.
God vs. the Gavel: A Brief Rejoinder,
Mich. L. Rev.
Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mlr/vol105/iss7/12