The historical fact that the law of armed conflict (LOAC) has always lagged behind current methods of warfare does not mean that it always must. This Article will argue that the underlying assumption that law must be reactive is not an intrinsic reality inherent in effective armed conflict governance. Rather, just as military practitioners work steadily to predict new threats and defend against them, LOAC practitioners need to focus on the future of armed conflict and attempt to be proactive in evolving the law to meet future needs.
Eric T. Jensen,
The Future of the Law of Armed Conflict: Ostriches, Butterflies, and Nanobots
Mich. J. Int'l L.
Available at: http://repository.law.umich.edu/mjil/vol35/iss2/3