Abstract
Several issues were raised on appeal to the New York Court of Appeals. Thoreson AKA DiLorenzo was the Respondent on the issue of sexual harassment and the Appellant on the issue of the amount of damages awarded by the Supreme Court. This portion of the brief addresses only the issue of sexual harassment. Wendy C. Lecker (J.D. 1988, New York University School of Law), authored a section on the issue of compensatory damages.
Recommended Citation
Dorchen A. Leidholdt,
Pimping and Pornography as Sexual Harassment: Amicus Brief in Support of Plaintiff-Respondent in Thoreson v. Penthouse Int'l LTD.,
1
Mich. J. Gender & L.
107
(1993).
Available at:
https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjgl/vol1/iss1/9
Included in
Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Litigation Commons