Edward L. Barrett, Jr.: The Critic with 'that Quality of Judiciousness Demanded of the Court Itself'
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1987
Abstract
Barrett was as talented and as dedicated a law teacher as any of his distinguished (or soon-to-become-distinguished) contemporaries. But Barrett resisted the movement toward new rights in fields where none had existed before. At least, he was quite uneasy about the trend. To be sure, others in law teaching shared Barrett's concern that the clock was spinning too fast. Indeed, some others were quite vociferous about it.' But because his criticism was cerebral rather than emotional - because he fairly stated and fully explored the arguments urging the courts to increase their tempo in developing constitutional rights - Barrett was probably the most formidable skeptic in criminal law teaching ranks when the so-called revolution in criminal procedure unfolded.
Recommended Citation
Kamisar, Yale. "Edward L. Barrett, Jr.: The Critic with 'that Quality of Judiciousness Demanded of the Court Itself'." U. C. Davis L. Rev. 20, no. 2 (1987): 191-218.
Included in
Criminal Procedure Commons, Evidence Commons, Fourth Amendment Commons, Supreme Court of the United States Commons